skip to nav

It was the killing of a black youth that led to McPherson, and it was the murder of Damilola Taylor in Peckham that resulted in an intensification of navel gazing by the British establishment when it came to questions of race and violent crime.

I'm not alone among London-based journalists, who, having written critical or insinuating remarks about Blair, were then summoned to Blair's top floor office at New Scotland Yard. Disarmingly like a self-publicising sociology lecturer from a minor provincial university, during our face time the commissioner did a good job of convincing me of what a hellishly difficult job it was policing London, and that he'd be much obliged if I put my shoulder to the common weal.

I took this thinly veiled self-exculpation over Stockwell with a whole packet of Maldon sea salt, but I remained then - and still am - impressed by Blair's commitment to a society genuinely free of the racist taint: no one but a genuine anti-racist would dare to make such unguarded remarks about institutional racism - especially when discussing an institution as dangerously vituperative as the press.

The irony that it was then Blair himself who became the accused - when it was alleged by Tarique Ghaffur that he sidelined them from promotion - was almost too delicious to suck on.

However,

Ian Blair’s contention that he couldn’t see what ‘all the fuss was about’ Soham is something he’s determined to stand by

much as it pains people to do so it seems to me that the only way to explain what has happened at the Met is to hold two apparently - but by no means in reality - contradictory propositions in our minds at once: yes, Blair did do all he could to stamp out institutional racism at the Met; but concurrently he fostered a poisonously political culture.

It was this culture, plus a hypersensitivity to race - rather than a genuine colourblindness - that gave the very ethnic minority officers Blair was supposedly championing an equality of opportunity; not to advance by the usual career progression - but along with the likes of Paddick, plunge the knife between the Commissioner's shoulderblades.

No, I see no reason to especially mourn Blair's passing - and those who live by the spin die hopelessly dizzy. However, I doubt London will get a permanent commissioner who's any less in thrall to sectional political interests, and while he or she may be less prone to gaffes, I wonder if she'll also have the courage to call the wider society out on its revolting - and ongoing - prejudices. 

FIRST POSTED DECEMBER 3, 2008
Previous

Filed under: Ian Blair, Will Self, Metropolitan Police, Jean Charles de Menezes, Damilola Taylor, McPherson Report, Tariq Ghaffur

Add to:

Comments

Hide comments

Splendid article. The events that surround Mr Blair's departure from the Commissioner's Office (New Scotland Yard) was a typical mish-mash of nonsense seen amongst university students everywhere who have supped a little too much el-cheapo wine. The reason for this is because what you have at the top are not professional police officers, they are university graduates - every man-jack of them. Degrees in this, that and everything else. The ordinary copper cannot expect promotion beyond Sergeant - and that is only if the vacancies aren't reserved for the fast-track boys and girls, those who join for promotion. So, what have we at the top? Not coppers coppers - well, not since Lord Steven's departure.

Posted by Paul Beaumont at 9:33am on March 9, 2009

Add comment

You must be signed into your user account to add a comment.

Please enter your email address and we will mail you your password

 

sign up for the daily email

go back...page 2 of 2

News & Comment: News & Politics