skip to nav

Collapse of Gaza truce threatens Israeli security

While politicians jockey for political position, the citizens of towns such as Sderot will suffer misery from missile strikes by Palestinian militants

FIRST POSTED DECEMBER 23, 2008

A new and potentially more destructive round of fighting in Gaza is looming following the collapse last weekend of the six-month truce between Israel and Hamas.

Israelis in vulnerable border towns like Sderot, battered repeatedly by rockets over the past few years, can expect to spend more time in their bomb shelters. Palestinians in Gaza City's teeming refugee camps will watch the sky apprehensively for air strikes that kill civilians and combatants alike.

And with tensions rising, political and military leaders in both camps are cranking up the bellicose rhetoric.

No sooner had the increasingly fragile truce finally expired than the two leading candidates for prime minister in Israel's February elections were competing to demonstrate their determination to crush Hamas.

Water and electricity services have virtually ceased to function in Gaza

Tzipi Livni, currently foreign minister and candidate for the ruling centrist party, promised that "toppling" Gaza's Islamist regime by any means would be top of her agenda. Israeli sources report that she is preparing a diplomatic offensive to lay the ground for a full-scale ground offensive in Gaza.

Her chief rival, Benjamin 'Bibi' Netanyahu, darling of Israel's hard-right and current front-runner in the polls, took himself (and the TV cameras) off to Sderot. Talking amid the smouldering ruins of a house that had been struck by a rocket, he made it clear that "conquering Gaza" was a live option for defeating Hamas.

Talking amid the smouldering ruins of a house that had been struck by a rocket, Netanyahu made it clear that ‘conquering Gaza’ was a live option for defeating Hamas

But neither he nor Livni offered any view about what would happen in the event of a military takeover of Gaza, from which Israel withdrew unilaterally just three years ago.

Nor did they suggest how this would put an end to the rocket attacks that have persisted for years: the home-made Qassem missiles can be quickly assembled and fired, often from the back of a pick-up truck, and their crews are adept at making a quick getaway before Israel can retaliate.

Meanwhile, there was no sign that Israel is prepared to loosen its 18-month-long economic blockade of Gaza, which has inflicted severe suffering on the impoverished population. Although the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund and the European Union have all expressed grave concern to the Israeli government about the impact of the blockade, the situation continues to deteriorate.

Water and electricity services have virtually ceased to function, the sewage system no longer works and medical supplies have run so short that patients are being turned away from clinics and hospitals.

As Western diplomats readily acknowledge in private, such widespread misery does not appear to have seriously undermined support for Hamas in Gaza - and any fresh military onslaught by Israel would only cement the organisation's position as heroic defenders of the people.

Some insiders also believe that the failure of the Palestinian Authority, chosen negotiating partner of the US, to influence Israeli strategy is seriously undermining its support on the streets of the West Bank.

For its part, Hamas has vowed to continue the "holy Islamic resistance", recently distributing videos of its fighters training hard for a possible Israeli invasion. Ominously, the group has also hinted that such an onslaught could lead to a resumption of its devastating suicide bombing operations inside Israel.

NOTE TO READERS: The First Post's daily Opinion Digest service will resume on Monday, January 5. 

FIRST POSTED DECEMBER 23, 2008
Add to:

Comments

Hide comments

The carrot and stick should be applied, more rockets means less items being allowed into Gaza thru Israel, they have kept Shallit in prison , if he is still alive, they will say the population will suffer, but not the hamas leaders, we don't want them in Israel and Israel does not want to be in Gaza, the answer must be one shell for one rocket, an eye for an eye, if they resort to suicide murder again the answer must be devistating retaliation, the world will condem Israel, that will be nothing new or surprising, as the Muslims kill off the Christians in Iraq and force them out of Bethlehem, the world will be silent, and still say that there is a blockade of Bethlehem even though one million visitors were there this year, Israel stay strong.

Posted by sidney sands at 12:42pm on December 23, 2008

Pity you allow your publication to disperse jewish propaganda as displayed by mr Sands. You are dealing with fools: Netanyahu, Livni and Sands. They illegally occupy Palestine and treat Gaza no different from what the Nazis did to the Jews in the Warsaw ghetto. I suggest they get out before they are driven out by superior numbers of Arabs. Ntombi

Posted by Bob Visser at 6:24pm on December 26, 2008

The casual, naive anti-Israel bias of your Opinion pages is one thing. But I see it's crept into your Newsdesk too. In today's "report" you report every claim about Israel's attacks as gospel. However, when it comes to the rocket attacks on Israel you tellingly use the word "claim". Shame on you. http://www.thefirstpost.co.uk/newsdesk,1798,israel-plans-gaza-ground-invasion,66056

Posted by Jack at 12:05pm on December 29, 2008

Add comment

You must be signed into your user account to add a comment.

Please enter your email address and we will mail you your password

 

sign up for the daily email

About the author

Philip Jacobson is a veteran foreign correspondent who has reported on conflicts around the world for The Times, The Sunday Times,... MORE

Also by this author

MORE...

News & Comment: News & Politics