skip to nav

Tariq Ramadan: the liberals’ favourite Muslim

Radical Reform by Tariq Ramadan

The post-modernist Muslim is worryingly short on ideas and tailors his message to different audiences, says Andrew Anthony

FIRST POSTED FEBRUARY 19, 2009

Although Koranic study and French post-modern theory may seem to be two very distinct modes of thought, they in fact share a common openness to multiple interpretations. At least, that’s the polite way of putting it. Some might say that they are both refuges for intellectual vagueness and evasion.

If so, then no one has benefited more from this particular conjunction of obscurantism than Tariq Ramadan, who brings a post-modernist sensibility to the business of discussing Islam.

Plenty know who Ramadan is, but few know what he actually stands for

The grandson of Hassan al Banna, the founder of the Muslim Brotherhood, Ramadan is a senior research fellow at St Anthony’s College, Oxford, and president of the think tank European Muslim Network.

As such, he is often spoken of as a leading Muslim intellectual, a reformist who is able to move between the academic circuit, the clerical establishment (he's been an ardent defender of the reactionary Sunni scholar Yusuf al-Qaradawi) and the wider Muslim population with equal felicity.

But so far the size of his reputation comfortably outstrips the strength of his ideas. There are plenty of people who know who Ramadan is, but far fewer who know what he actually stands for.

And of those that do think they know, some believe that Ramadan tailors his message to different audiences - secular and Muslim - to such an extent that it amounts to deception.

French journalist Caroline Fourest set out to expose Ramadan's alleged inconsistencies in her book
Caroline Fourest

In one case he argues for a modernised Islam, in the other for an Islamised modernity. The French journalist Caroline Fourest set out to expose these alleged inconsistencies and wrote a book entitled Brother Tariq: The Doublespeak of Tariq Ramadan.

Reading Ramadan’s latest book, Radical Reform: Islamic Ethics and Liberation (OUP, £16.99), does little to clear up the issue. In essence it's an argument for a less literalist approach to Islamic texts, but also for upholding the primacy of these texts.

This, in many ways, is the job that's confronted Christian theologians since the Enlightenment, and one need only look at the moral contortions that the Church of England regularly performs to see the problems of reconciling the 'word of God' with modern-day reality.

But better the muddle that anti-literalism entails than the 

About the author

Andrew Anthony is a feature writer for the Observer. Last year he published a controversial polemical memoir The Fallout: How a... MORE

Also by this author

sign up for the daily email

News & Comment: News & Politics