skip to nav

The US is relying on an army of drones to fight the Taliban and al-Qaeda in Pakistan

Carr - Robokillers

America's Army of the Grand Robotic is taking centre stage in the War on Terror

FIRST POSTED MARCH 13, 2009

As Pakistan sinks deeper into political chaos, the spreading violence that threatens to destabilize the country may not be unrelated to the increasingly automated offensive being waged by the United States in the Federally-Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) against Taliban camps and suspected al-Qaeda strongholds.

Since last September some 100 militants and an unknown number of civilians have been killed by Predator and more heavily armed MQ-9 Reaper 'drones' operating from bases in Afghanistan and Pakistan, such as the Shamsi airfield near Quetta. Only last Friday, on March 13, a drone strike killed 21 militants at a training camp in Kurram, a remote tribal area of northwestern Pakistan.

Equipped with laser-guided bombs and air-to-ground missiles and able to remain in the sky at altitudes of up to 26,000 feet for 24 hours at a time, the 'unmanned aerial vehicle' (UAV) has increasingly become the weapon of choice for the US military in its escalating warp across the Afghan border. Pakistani intelligence reports suggest that these attacks have brought dozens of recruits into the ranks of the Taliban, seeking revenge for those killed by America's 'eyes in the sky'.

The ‘Army of the Grand Robotic’ is part of the US fantasy of absolute dominationThe repercussions of the 'drone war' may not be limited to Pakistan. At present, some 5,000 robotic vehicles and UAVs are deployed in Iraq, Afghanistan and the North West territories. These machines perform various functions, from surveillance and offensive operations to the detection of Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs) and they may well become a ubiquitous feature of the 21st century battleground. By 2015, the Pentagon’s $230bn arms procurement programme Future Combat Systems (FCS) expects to robotize some fifteen percent of America's armed forces.

At a time when the US Armed forces are running short of manpower, this 'Army of the Grand Robotic' has an obvious appeal. Robot weapons are also seen as particularly useful in the complicated and far-flung battlezones of the 'War on Terror', allowing the US military to strike their enemies almost anywhere in the world without risking its own soldiers. Such weapons are also part of the megalomaniac US military doctrine of 'Full Spectrum Dominance' – and the fantasy of absolute domination through technological supremacy that goes with it.

The enthusiasm for these weapons raises disturbing possibilities about the wars of the future and the future of war. At present UAVs are usually directed by trained pilots, who operate their machines from bases some 7,500 miles from their target. But last week a 

Next

Filed under: War on terror, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Drone, Robot, US Army, Taliban, al-Qaeda

Add to:

Comments

Hide comments

A question of life imitating Hollywood then. Soon the US won't be able to afford such expensive weapons to kill wedding parties. The cheaper option would be bio-weapons... look out for outbreaks of fatal disease in areas the US has issues with.

Posted by Peter Simmons at 1:09pm on April 17, 2009

Strange article,ill informed and extreamly ignorant of military facts.The fact is that if you are not sitting on the land you dont control the land.Get real!

Posted by ROBERT BOYD at 4:53pm on May 24, 2009

"military facts"?! Germany surrendered in 1918, and NOT because the Allies were "sitting on their land". Counterinsurgency is NOT like "conventional" war. What may be a good plan in one is likely to be exactly the opposite in the other. Americans can often be hard to whine "...but we won ALL the battles in VietNam". but without understanding that it was their job to PREVENT battles. Who "won" battles was irrelevant: if they happened at all, then it was an American failure. The movie "Michael Collins" should be required viewing for all those claiming "expertise" in this area (like the previous poster) Collins was a man who took a small irregular military force and a not-very-popular cause, and by provoking the enemy into a series of over-reactions, he was able to turn the issue into a "cause celebre", and recruit much of the population to it. (Or at least, turn them into enemies of HIS enemies.) The Brits lost... but we also learned from the experience; behaved more appropriately in subsequent similar situations. Americans however are different. They tend not to learn, but prefer instead to DENY that their mistakes ever happened. Firefighters recruit from people of roughly the same mindset as the military: the two grouos "think alike". American firefighters are EIGHT TIMES more likely to get killed than firemen from other modern, (and thus similarly equiped) nations. Not because of inferior equipment, but simply because of their mindset.

Posted by Ron Walker at 2:56pm on June 14, 2009

Add comment

You must be signed into your user account to add a comment.

  Forgotten password?
 
  or create an account

sign up for the daily email

News & Comment: News & Politics