skip to nav

is on the other foot. In Fritzl's cellar he was the one in control. Fritzl admitted to Mayer: "The cellar in my building belonged to me and me alone - it was my kingdom, that only I had access to."

In his cellar world, Fritzl was not only in complete control but he could wreak revenge on the mother who imprisoned him in his childhood by his repeated attacks against his daughter which he also admits he was addicted to.

He could play the part of the mother who tortured and emotionally raped her child and he could also become, in his fantasy, his mother's partner and have babies with her, triumphing over his need for a father.

Fritzl allegedly thought it was a "lovely idea" to have a family in the cellar.
Josef Fritzl hides under a blue folder

Fritzl claims that his sexual relations with his daughter were consensual, despite her testimony that she was chained to a wall. The act of raping his daughter was addictive not only in the omnipotent excitement it gave Fritzl but it also provided a way for him to discharge his hatred towards his mother while at the same time keeping the relationship alive.

Better a hateful relationship than no relationship at all. Fritzl had constructed a fantasy life that in many respects replicated his childhood but was also a denial and a triumph over the reality of his childhood.

Just as in his past there had been no father to protect him from his mother's hatred, in the cellar there was no metaphorical father, no super-ego within Fritzl to protect him or his daughter and children from their imprisonment in a world of hate.

As long as Fritzl could perpetuate the sado-masochistic world of his childhood in the cellar, he was safe from having to face the grim reality of a hateful mother and an indifferent father - a reality that might have tipped him over into psychosis.

Fritzl allegedly thought it was a "lovely idea" to have a family in the cellar. And for Fritzl it was just this - by keeping his fantasy family in the cellar he could keep his madness locked up and safely contained in the confines of his unconscious. His remorse and his concern are most probably genuine for what happened to his daughter and the children he sired with her (including one baby who died after he refused to call for medical help).

Fritzl has previous. He was convicted of raping a woman in Linz in 1967

At the same time, he needed to use his daughter in creating this fantasy world so as not to go completely mad. At an unconscious level, it seems that the rest of the family upstairs may have been complicit in keeping Fritzl's madness below ground in their denial of what was going on.

Rosemary, Fritzl's wife, does not seem to have questioned either her daughter's disappearance, running off to join an extremist sect, or the appearance of grandchildren that suddenly turned up for adoption.

Fritzl's criminal behaviour has a history. He had been convicted of raping a woman in Linz in 1967 and served a term in prison for this. This seems to indicate that he had little control over his impulses and may well have been anxious that this could happen again.

"Around 1981 or 1982", as Fritzl admitted, he started preparing his cellar for its first occupant. In 1984 Elisabeth disappeared. At his trial, after his face emerged from hiding behind that blue folder, Fritzl remained expressionless to the public except for an occasional smile - perhaps at his own triumph in achieving 24 years of outwitting reality. 

FIRST POSTED MARCH 18, 2009
Previous

Filed under: Austria, Josef Fritzl, Murder, Rape

Add to:

Comments

Hide comments

Can you imagine living in a house with a basement and not wondering what it was like down there? Never hearing a sound for all those years? Impossible. How many other Fritzls are ther out there? Dozens, probably. There's no such thing as one of anything.

Posted by Daniel Pallant at 12:48pm on March 19, 2009

Whatever anyone may think of the idea that Josef Fritzl was a caring and compassionate man, the very fact of the brutality that he caused his daughter and grandchildren more than proves that he was and is a person that deserves the harshest penalties allowed under Austrian law. Josef Fritzl proves the adage that, 'mankind will always do the worst to the one's that they love.' I have no sympathy for that man, he is an abominable creature that chose to act in a manner that is not consistent with the human race. Many people grow up in horrible and traumatic situations, yet they do not act like he has, I have the utmost sympathy and empathy for his daughter and 'children/grandchildren' for they are the ones who were innocent in all of the actions that he did. Please make sure that this man is put away for the rest of his life in a prison that he will not be able to escape from and will never be let out of.

Posted by nrobi at 3:20pm on March 19, 2009

Death is too good for him but it is beyond credulity that his 'upstairs' wife didn't know. It proves once again the evil of banality.

Posted by allan kessing at 10:57am on March 20, 2009

I didn't get anything out of this Freudian analysis at all. "The act of raping his daughter was addictive not only in the omnipotent excitement it gave Fritzl but it also provided a way for him to discharge his hatred towards his mother while at the same time keeping the relationship alive." Really? Delineating the aetiology of Fritzl's psycho-sexual fantasies, and the reasons he went about making them a reality, is a challenge of similar proportions to long-term weather forecasting. The psychoanalysts help us through that challenge in much the same way that sacrifices to Janus helped Caesar predict the weather.

Posted by Rohan Moore at 1:37am on March 23, 2009

Although I love the work of Carl Jung, and the concepts of Jungian psychology in general, I am more inclined to subscribe to the work of Robert Hare on psychopathy when trying to understand the behavior of Fritzl's kind. I doubt Fritzl feels genuine sorry for his victims. In his world, people exist only insofar as they advance or are on obstacle to his own internal drama. They have no real meaning or value in and of themselves, he does not see them as possessing an internal world and desires independent of his own. It is truly an act of hate, of derangement, to watch another human being suffer so and remain oblivious to their suffering, at best, or at worse, enjoy their suffering, as he apparently did. He tortured his own children physically, emotionally, spiritually. There is no justification, no understanding beyond that.

Posted by karen meyer at 3:28pm on March 24, 2009

Yet again it - apparently - is the fault of a woman when a man behaves appallingly. He is filth, and should be recycled into something useful like fertiliser.

Posted by Peter Simmons at 12:14pm on April 16, 2009

Add comment

You must be signed into your user account to add a comment.

  Forgotten password?
 
  or create an account

sign up for the daily email

go back...page 2 of 2

News & Comment: News & Politics