skip to nav

Sorry, Esther Rantzen, the public and Parliament don't need you

Esther Rantzen

The public doesn't need Esther Rantzen to help them boot out corrupt politicians - it's called an election

FIRST POSTED MAY 18, 2009

Startling news. Esther Rantzen is thinking of standing as an independent candidate against Margaret Moran, the Labour MP for Luton South.

Moran flipped her second home and then claimed £22,500 for a dry rot bill at a seaside house 100 miles away from her constituency. She's one of the villains of the recent revelations over MP's expenses.

Inspired, no doubt, by that other 60-something campaigner, Joanna Lumley, and the success she had in turning the public against the politicians with her campaign for Gurkha rights, Esther Rantzen has decided to save us from ourselves.

Never mind the fact that, with Labour doing so badly, Margaret Moran, even if she isn't deselected by her constituency, doesn't have a chance of keeping her 5,650 majority.

For every Martin Bell we get a Robert Kilroy-Silk

"If the voters think it's worthwhile and they want me, here I am", breathes the former That's Life host and Childline champion. How will she know? Hire a focus group? Maybe she can ask Martin Bell. Because she tells us that she has been wondering: "Surely Mr Bell could now offer a new generation of hopefuls a few tips on how it's done?"

What is it with people like Esther Rantzen and Martin Bell that makes them think they are moral exemplars worthy of the public's trust? Does a lifetime spent living off licence payers' money somehow make them think they've got a superior moral status to people who spend their lifetimes living off the taxpayer? What next? The Chuckle Brothers pledging to stand against Yvette Cooper and Ed Balls? Jonathan Ross taking on Hazel Blears?

It never works. For every Martin Bell - who only won Tatton from Neil Hamilton in the 1997 general election because the Lib Dems and Labour candidate stood aside - we get a Robert Kilroy-Silk, who grandstands about cleaning up the EU, then falls out with his own party UKIP weeks after joining. He isn't even standing at next month's EU elections.

A sad truth: the only people who can clean up politics are politicians

What exactly did Martin Bell achieve, anyway? He may make pretty speeches, and get invited to moralise on Newsnight once in a while, but he didn't change a single law. He didn't even win a seat the second time he did his Wat Tyler act, losing to Eric Pickles in another constituency, Brentwood and Ongar - after accusations that a Pentecostal church had infiltrated the local Conservative Association - in 2001. These showbiz types are one-trick ponies.

The sad, brutal, even possibly tragic fact is that the only people who can clean up politics are politicians themselves. We might fill the House of Commons with 650 versions of Esther Rantzen, but there is no more reason to think they'd agree on what constitutes reasonable expenses than they would on anything else.

The professionals, on the other hand, still have an incentive to get it right. They have to face an election every five years. That concentrates the mind of a professional more effectively than it would a disillusioned celeb who doesn't mind being kicked out after one term.

A TV presenter didn't oust Michael Portillo: the public did that. And unless Margaret Moran gets her houses in order, the public will do the same to her. 

FIRST POSTED MAY 18, 2009

Filed under: UK politics, MPs expenses, Esther Rantzen

Add to:

Comments

Hide comments

If there were secret ballots in the House of Commons, the power of the Whips would be broken for ever. This would mean that back benchers would, at last, be back in control and that being an MP would be worthwhile and not a "profession" leading up to being minister of beans and peas, or Home Secretary for a year or two.

Posted by prziloczek at 5:56pm on May 19, 2009

Go on Esther. That reporter must be a Labour supporter. Surprisingly he cannot remember the Gurkha for Justice Campaign fought so valiantly by Joanna Lumley. His Labour Government won't forget. It could cost them the next Election. So if you stand Esther Good Luck. I am sure you will attract quite a lot of moral support despite this reporter's silly comments. Lest we Forget!

Posted by redhacklehay at 10:47am on May 20, 2009

Wow. Redhacklehay makes a judgement on someone's political persuasion based on... not much really, which is a shame. (and more than a little short sighted- argue what's written, not how you think someone votes!) David Aaronovich agrees in principal with what Briffa has said here: http://tinyurl.com/qesg7t

Posted by Ben at 11:24am on May 20, 2009

If she wins she might just keep the seat warm for the return of Moran's party next time. Much better to let another real party win so someone with an interest in the job can do it.

Posted by TomNightingale at 12:46pm on May 20, 2009

"The Professionals..", so lauded in this by-the-numbers hack piece, are the problem. Apart from sounding like a tacky 70s TV prog (hmm, quite apposite come to think of it..) how can someone slithering from skool to uni to ward heeler to party apparatchik be a REPRESENTATIVE of anything except a rotten system?

Posted by allan kessing at 2:41am on May 21, 2009

What special talent would Esther Rantzen bring to parliament apart from being able to eat an apple through a letter-box?

Posted by dennis parkes at 6:56pm on May 22, 2009

No. A million times "No" - we will not benefit from turning the Houses of Ill-Repute into "Let me in, I'm a Celebrity" Think about it! We are awash in a celebrity driven culture now with all the tawdriness that bestows on a gullible public - to let this culture of debased values take over our political decision making is the final mile to Hell! We do NOT Need Rantzen or her ilk what we do need is an Intellectual, Intelligent Right Wing to end the political correctness, end immigration overflows (not immigration, per se) end this sychophantic liberal left and bestow some sound principles back in education and personal moral fibre matters.

Posted by roger CARTER at 2:09pm on May 31, 2009

Add comment

You must be signed into your user account to add a comment.

Please enter your email address and we will mail you your password

 

sign up for the daily email

About the author

Peter Briffa is a playwright and screenwriter who lives in East London. He has written for The Times, and the liberal... MORE

Also by this author

News & Comment: News & Politics