skip to nav
FIRST POSTED JUNE 11, 2009

where they take you to another place. In Miami it was a bit bigger and with this grid through which you could see a little piece of the sky. You could tell if it was day or night. There we were 23, sometimes 24, hours a day, inside those four small walls, with nothing to do. It's very difficult from a humane point of view. And many people couldn't take it. You could see them start to lose their minds, start screaming."

Having set North Korea's barbarity in a larger perspective, let us turn to the dangers its testing programme and intermittent detonations pose to world security.

On May 25, North Korea conducted its second underground nuclear test, two-and-a-half years after its first. Obama promptly denounced it as "a grave threat to the peace and stability of the world". He added that North Korea's actions had "flown in the face of United Nations resolutions" and were inviting deeper international isolation.

HMS Vanguard, which collided a with a French nuclear submarine
HMS Vanguard

Almost four months earlier, Obama had nothing to say when, on February 3 or 4, two nuclear-powered submarines, one British, one French, each carrying nuclear missiles, collided in the middle of the Atlantic ocean. Unlike the North Koreans, who immediately reported their test to the world, Britain and France said nothing. Neither did the United States. The three Nato powers hoped that this indubitable threat to world safety would remain a secret.

On February 16, the Sun was the first paper to disclose the crash. Then, and only then, an anonymous British official said the submarine Vanguard's "deterrent capability remained unaffected and there was no compromise to nuclear safety". The question of what either sub was supposed to be deterring was not addressed.

France's Defence Ministry said in a brief statement on February 6 that the sub Le Triomphant had struck "a submerged object (probably a container)" during a return from a patrol, damaging the sonar dome on the front of the submarine. The Ministry did not confirm the date of the collision, and didn't mention the British sub.

The Vanguard limped back to home port, considerably dented, according to observers. Le Triomphant, blind because of the damage to its sonar dome, was escorted by a frigate back to its base on France's west coast. There is no reason to believe a single word of either the British or French governments' accounts of the crash.

Sarkozy's first speech on 'defence' after he became president came with the dedication of Le Triomphant's sister sub, Le Terrible, and a threat to nuke Iran. Tony Blair closed out his decade as prime minister by announcing a new series of nuclear subs to carry the Trident nukes. He singled out North Korea for specific mention.

"No single nation should pick and choose which nations hold nuclear weapons," Obama declared piously in Cairo, even as he told Iran that "when it comes to nuclear weapons, we have reached a decisive point" and as his Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, went on ABC TV to talk murkily about "consequences and costs" if Iran developed nuclear weapons, and then stumbled through a hypothesis about a US attack, even "a first strike".

And they call North Korea a rogue nation? 

FIRST POSTED JUNE 11, 2009
Previous

Filed under: North Korea, USA, Cuba

Add to:

Comments

Hide comments

Double standards is one of the major issues that Obama has to address. The shame of Guantanomo Bay is the tip of a very large iceberg. Obama has started to deal with that. Lets hope that he doesn't finish with just that!

Posted by VirgoSwan at 11:57am on June 12, 2009

We're profoundly grateful to Alexander Cockburn for the revelations made in this excellent piece.

Posted by neil mcgowan at 11:59am on June 12, 2009

No matter what, the USA will forever be tainted by the Guantanimo Bay fiasco, as well as with what happened in the US-controlled prisons in Baghdad. "Saint Obama" cannot change that. Bob Visser

Posted by Bob Visser at 1:01pm on June 12, 2009

And also no matter what, America stands as a giant and unrelenting bully to Cuba! Its position is not based on any respect or love for human rights (witness the treatment of the Cuban 5 as set forth in this article), rather it all goes back to money - the basis for everything in America! The U.S. is mad because Fidel and his boys nationalized exploitative U.S companies after they took over, and those companies, and the politicians that they support, still want their money back. The human rights issue need be discussed no further than the fact that the U.S. was a full supporter of Batsista and his goons. Human rights were not on Batista's agenda. Cuba remains a big black eye of disgrace upon America, and the sooner the U.S. grows up and takes a positive stand on Cuba, the better it will be for everyone.

Posted by Douglas Smith at 7:24pm on June 12, 2009

It is not a good look from America. But at least America is not threatening a nuclear war as North Korea is under Kim.

Posted by don roberts at 3:24am on June 15, 2009

Add comment

You must be signed into your user account to add a comment.

  Forgotten password?
 
  or create an account

sign up for the daily email

go back...page 2 of 2

News & Comment: News & Politics