skip to nav

What they saying about Speaker Bercow

John Bercow

Most of it is not polite as Tories put the 46-year-old on probation until the next election

FIRST POSTED JUNE 23, 2009

Is Conservative John Bercow destined to be the shortest-serving Speaker in history? It was beginning to look that way last night as Tory after Tory told media contacts how unimpressed they were at his election and, in effect, they were putting him on probation until the general election. If they still dislike him then as much as they do now, he is in danger of being voted out of office.

The Times reported a shadow cabinet member as saying: "He is not popular. He has enjoyed being Labour's man in this contest. His speech today was dreadful. He is quite unacceptable."

The antagonism is all about Bercow's personal politics. Once a right-winger - he was chairman of the pro-apartheid Federation of Conservative Students and a member of the far-right Monday Club - he has travelled so far leftwards that, before he entered the race for the Speaker's chair, many in the Commons assumed he might actually cross to Labour.

His conversion is thought to date back to his marriage in 2002 to Sally Illman, a former Labour Party activist. Whatever the reason, David Hencke in the Guardian reports that Bercow is now the sole Tory supporting Harriet Harman's equality legislation and prepared to join Diane Abbott to support all-black shortlists for parliamentary seats.

"Even youngish men can acquire wisdom as time goes by," Bercow told MPs yesterday, as he promised "immediately and permanently to cast aside" all his political views in order to fulfill his duties as Speaker.

Some of his Tory colleagues have even charged that he's only in it for the money. The Speaker gets a salary of £144,520 - more then double that of a backbench MP - plus a grace-and-favour apartment overlooking the Thames, and one of the most generous pension schemes in Britain. Given his youth - he's only 46 - if he does manage to stay on through the next election and beyond, he could build up a pension pot in the millions.

WHAT THEY ARE SAYING

Mary Riddell in the Daily Telegraph: In Iran people are dying in the streets for a democracy that they will get one day, because they will settle for nothing less. In Westminster, for all the talk of gory battles and Shakespearian fates, there won't be blood. The contest for the Speaker did not evoke political revolution so much as a fractious struggle for the presidency of the Chipping Sodbury Allotment Association.

Rachel Sylvester in the Times: The resignation of Michael Martin was supposed to be a catalyst for change, but the process of choosing his replacement has revealed how little politicians understand the scale of the problem that they face. While the voters are crying out for honesty and integrity, the election of the new Speaker has been all about petty politicking and party power games.

Quentin Letts in the Daily Mail: They went and did the impossible. They voted for someone who could be even worse than Gorbals Mick! Large parts of the Tory benches refused to clap his election and they looked thoroughly sickened, sitting with arms crossed and shaking their heads. Real, gut-churning hatred. Little Squeaker Bercow has his work cut out.

The Mole for The First Post: This result only came after a battle that did little to unite MPs or show the Commons was set on fundamental reform rather than conducting business as usual. 

FIRST POSTED JUNE 23, 2009

Filed under: John Bercow, Michael Martin, The Speaker

Add to:

Comments

Hide comments

JOHN BERCOW ELECTED SPEAKER 22.06.09 So the man with seemingly few principles or deeply held convictions was elected. The man who changed his core beliefs and politics to suit his ambitions. How can someone change from being ultra right wing to ultra liberal overnight? What he calls his moment of 'enlightenment' or his political journey. Did he have a Damascus Road experience? I don't think so, more like the minute he realised he would have to court New Labour and Lib Dems. MPs favour, to achieve his ambition of becoming Speaker of the House. It is then he must have decided to do whatever it took to achieve his goal. Even if it meant being disloyal to his own party and its leaders and 'greasing up' to the opposition at every opportunity. In other words he was prepared to sell his soul for the 'pot of gold' he yearned for. Close observers of John Bercow knew this; especially his Tory colleagues. No wonder they had such solemn faces when the result was announced. Only when prompted by David Cameron did a few Tory MPs give a slow and weak hand-clap, the rest decided to keep their arms crossed or hands firmly on their laps. One Tory MP shouted, 'Not in my name!' As the labour benches enjoyed their moment of childish spite with their smiling faces knowing they had left their final lasting legacy, by achieving something with their 'bloc vote', that would hurt David Cameron and the Conservative Party when they get into power, long after this New Labour Government sinks beneath the waves; in their rotten and stinking ship. Knowing John Bercow's liberal views on abortion and hearing about his ridiculous amendment that he tabled for the third reading of the Embryology Bill last year, (which wasn't heard in the end, due to a government guillotine on the bill) reflected his new ultra liberal views on moral issues. I therefore fear for the protection of unborn children in the UK; when the emotive issue is next debated in the House. I and many others will be watching for his promised fairness and impartiality on such issues. How will he stop himself from ridiculing people who disagree with him? Will he continue to use his old method of shutting down the debate, by personally attacking his opponents to undermine them? I and many others will be watching him very closely on important debates; especially on moral issues.

Posted by Simon Icke at 7:34pm on June 24, 2009

The Sunday Telegraph 28.06.2009 reveals more details of John Bercow's 40,000 private income. Page 7 Quote by Patrick Sawer & Melissa Kite: 'The new Commons Speaker was accused last night of profiting from his work as a government adviser on special educational needs. John Bercow was paid 40,000 by a health care firm which hired him after he wrote a report that led to a 52 million increase in special needs funding. The MP worked for six months for the Priory Group, which runs a number of special needs schools, giving advice about children who suffer from speech and language difficulties. He attended around five board meetings before he resigned from the post on becoming Speaker last week The payments declared by Mr Bercow in the Register of Members' Interests will now raise questions about the propriety of MPs taking money from firms working in an area in which they have dealt directly in Parliament. Tory opponents of Mr Berocow, who was voted in as Michael Martin's replacement despite little support from his own party, said the disclosures cast fresh doubts on his suitability as Speaker. " This calls into question his judgement. He appears to have profited from his work as Brown's adviser", said one MP. Mr Bercow, once a member of the right-wing Monday Club but now on the left of his party, has also been criticised for "flipping" the designation of his second home, enabling him to avoid paying capital gains tax.' Unquote.

Posted by Simon Icke at 4:31pm on June 28, 2009

Add comment

You must be signed into your user account to add a comment.

  Forgotten password?
 
  or create an account

sign up for the daily email

People: People in the News