skip to nav

After expenses comes the ‘moonlighting’ issue

The Mole

The Mole: Revelations about earnings from outside interests could damage all parties, says our Westminster insider

FIRST POSTED JUNE 26, 2009

Gordon Brown is hoping one of the political traps he set for the Tories in the wake of the expenses scandal will ensnare David Cameron next week, when all MPs will be required to reveal full details of their 'moonlighting' activities.

The Tories are bracing themselves for fresh revelations showing the full extent to which shadow ministers and other senior Tory MPs earn huge amounts from outside interests, often for precious little actual work.

Cameron has already suffered a rebellion over the matter when he originally suggested his frontbenchers should give up their second jobs. Shadow foreign secretary and de-facto deputy leader William Hague was said to be particularly infuriated as he was one of the Commons' top earners for his after-dinner speeches.

In the end, Cameron backed down, but the expenses affair gave Brown the opportunity to bring in new rules that will require MPs to detail their other incomes - and that will see many of them, including Tory frontbenchers, finally giving ground and abandoning some of this work.

Hague, who last year earned £230,000 from speeches, consultancies and book writing, has now started giving up his outside interests and has pledged to drop all of them by the end of the year.

Meanwhile, senior Tory Oliver Letwin, who is drawing up the party's manifesto, has confirmed he earned £60,000 a year doing eight hours work a week for the Rothschild bank and has promised to give up the work "in due course".

Similarly frontbencher David Willetts has said he will be giving up his £80,000-a-year job as consultant by the end of the year. Others, including Andrew Mitchell and Alan Duncan, have also already agreed to scale back their lucrative outside earnings.

But there are many more who have directorships and other interests and Brown hopes this will hand him further ammunition to paint the Conservatives as the party for millionaires, a theme he has already taken up in relation to Cameron's plan to cut inheritance tax.

There is the underlying issue of exactly what some of the firms employing MPs expect in return for their cash, particularly when the individual politician does little actual work for them - the implication being the aim is to exert political influence.

However, there are danger for Brown too – notably in the cases of former Labour ministers who quickly take up lucrative work with firms operating in areas linked to their previous responsibilities.

For example, former health secretary Alan Milburn is reported to be a non-executive director at Diaverum AB, a Swedish healthcare company, and has earned £25,000 as a member of Lloyd's pharmacy advisory panel.

And Ian McCartney, the former trade minister, a job which included responsibility for nuclear energy policy, is giving up a £113,000 consultancy with an American nuclear energy company. He has already announced he is standing down at the next election.

As with expenses, the 'moonlighting' revelations could end up affecting all parties - and damaging the entire political system. 

FIRST POSTED JUNE 26, 2009

Filed under: The Mole, Westminster

Add to:

Comments

Hide comments

60k per annum for 8 hours a week. He must be good!! Who cares if they are earning money from outside interests. At least it is not from dipping into the public purse. If Hague can write books that sell and deliver speeches that people are willing to pay for then what is wrong with that? Again at least he is not running workshops on how to fleece the system. I think Brown's smear campaigns are little more than misguided pot shots!

Posted by Breezy at 9:42am on June 26, 2009

"Ian McCartney, the former trade minister, a job which included responsibility for nuclear energy policy, is giving up a 113,000 pound consultancy with an American nuclear energy company." - quite right too - that's an outrageous conflict of interest. Never mind all the nonsense over claiming for a packet of Hob-Nobs; these people really are rats.

Posted by Polsonby at 9:48am on June 26, 2009

What exactly are McCartney's qualifications for providing "consultancy services" to a nuclear energy company? Without being bitchy, he has no relevant educational qualification; and his time and performance as a politician/minister in the field does not add up to much (sorry to say I can recall no statements, interviews, Parliamentary debates by him, and I am very interested in the field). In other words, he is being paid (not "earning") 113,000 pounds(a year?) for some nebulous services... at least, according to his biography, much if not all of the money is going to worthy causes.

Posted by alan scott at 5:34pm on June 26, 2009

I was hoping for exactly the opposite, stop paying them a salary so that the deadbeats who cannot hold down a real job would be forced out. Being an MP should involve thinking in the light of job experience, not a question of towing the line as a reward for not thinking. Unfortunately the Labour Party wouldn't then have any candidates.

Posted by John Clare at 6:53pm on June 26, 2009

Few, if any, civil servants are allowed to undertake outside paid employment, and NONE, that is NIL,NADA,ZERO,ZILCH anything to do with the day jobs. If these MPs are so underengaged with their parliamentaryduties they are either,(i) of such huge capacity - ie (the allegedly)Two Brains Willets or Bulge Brain little Willie Vague..err..sorry Hague or, (ii) more likely they are defrauding one or more of the paymasters. I couldn't care less if they are ripping off the drunk and/or self deluded at post prandial speeches but, as their PRIMARY employer & paymaster, I the TAXPAYER say "ENUFF, begone, don't let the door hit you on the way out"

Posted by allan kessing at 12:37pm on June 27, 2009

Add comment

You must be signed into your user account to add a comment.

  Forgotten password?
 
  or create an account

sign up for the daily email

News & Comment: News & Politics