Madness of wanting to be normal: Nancy Garrido’s make-believe family

Wife of sex offender Phillip Garrido had powerful capacity for denial, says Coline Covington
In his first 90-minute interview with Nancy Garrido, the wife of Phillip Garrido, her lawyer Gilbert Maines reported: "She has said to me she misses the girls, that she loves them and her feeling was they had become a family. They acted like a family. It seems strange given the circumstances but that's it. She's distraught, frightened, and appeared to be a little lost."
The 'circumstances' Maines refers to are the discovery last week that Phillip and Nancy Garrido had abducted 11-year-old Jaycee Lee Dugard in South Lake Tahoe in 1991, and held her captive in ramshackle tents and sheds at the bottom of their Californian garden.
The 'family' consists of Jaycee Lee Dugard's two daughters, 15-year-old Starlet and 11-year-old Angel, fathered by Phillip Garrido and raised as if they were Nancy's children and Jaycee Lee Dugard was their older sister.
The dispute now is whether Nancy was a victim of what Maines describes as her husband's "suppressive control" or whether she was a willing accomplice. Whatever the ultimate verdict, Nancy is named in the 29 felony charges, including forcible rape, that have been made against her husband and herself.
Neighbours describe Nancy as very quiet, depressed and anxious looking, and in the shadow of her husband, deferring to him when asked any questions. Phillip Garrido's brother described Nancy as a "robot" who was "under his [brother's] spell" and would do "anything he asked."
There seems to be no doubt that Nancy's compliance towards her husband was extreme. There is also a striking resemblance between Nancy's "robotic" mindlessness and the mindlessness presented by the two daughters, who had never gone to school, never seen a doctor and were rarely seen outside their sound-proofed tent.
Nancy’s choice of husband indicates that she had a powerful capacity for denial
This mindlessness was maintained within the restricted family environment that allowed only minimal contact with the outside world. Typical to children who have grown up being abused, this was their only experience of being in a family and being cared for and, as such, perceived as "normal".
On the other hand, Jaycee Lee Dugard had not grown up in this kind of environment and was forced to assimilate the madness of her new environment in order to survive both physically and mentally. While Jaycee Lee Dugard was "brainwashed", as a new member of a tyrannical and perverse regime, her daughters, and possibly Nancy, had never known anything different.
Nancy is thought to have been actively involved in Jaycee's abduction and subsequent incarceration. She is suspected of being in the car and physically kidnapping Dugard while her husband was
driving. She witnessed her husband's sexual abuse
- Most Read
- Most Emailed
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10



Comments
Hide comments
What I cannot understand is how a man sentenced to 50 years can be "nearing the end of his sentence" ten years later! One fifth of his sentence for a violent attack? Why do the authorities not think about protecting the public when they look at parole? If this man had been made to serve his proper sentence, this horror would never have happened.
Posted by Vivien Tarkirk-Smith at 6:25pm on September 7, 2009
The courts in America, much like the courts in the UK, are awash with liberal slop about 'rights'. What they need, and what we need is the assertion of 'rights and wrongs'. When they slop on about the deprived backgrounds of these perpetrators, we should have two questions ready: 1) what was the name of the victim(s) again? 2) what loss of rights did they suffer, and how wrong is that?
Posted by michael jose at 2:07pm on September 8, 2009
When people accused of horrific criminal offences claim to have "been abused as a child", any judge should be demanding an investigation to find out who the abusers were and have them charged also. It is an all too common defence that is accepted on face value alone.
Posted by MichaelG at 5:59pm on September 8, 2009
Excuse me; how is any of THEIR 'issues' the victims' problems? So, these two nut-jobs were in a fantasy world... big deal! This crime isn't about THEM and the injustices life gave THEM. Both of these individuals knew right from wrong, and they both knew what they did was illegal and an injustice to the victim and her family [life]. Frankly, I don't care about THEM... throw the book at them and make an example of them already!
Posted by Dean Morgan at 9:28pm on September 15, 2009
Always searching for an excuse to explain a woman's crimes while men are just taken as guilty. We still live in a sexist society.
Posted by HTuttle at 5:26am on October 7, 2009
Add comment
You must be signed into your user account to add a comment.