Why the world is scared of hermaphrodites

Ambiguous gender identity in another can trigger anxieties about our own unconscious homosexual fantasies, says psychoanalyst Coline Covington
I see it all as a joke, it doesn't upset me. God made me the way I am and I accept myself." This was Caster Semenya's response to accusations made following her exceptional victory in the women's 800m final at the recent world athletics championships that she is a man, not a woman.
However, Semenya made this statement when she was convinced she was a woman. Now it seems the facts are not so clear and leaked medical tests, conducted under the aegis of the IAAF, indicate that the 18-year-old South African winner has both male and female sexual characteristics. The 'joke' has turned nasty. Semenya has been transformed from star to monster in the eyes of the world - seen, mistakenly, as neither man nor woman but as hermaphrodite.
The controversy within the professional world of competitive sports centres on the crucial division between men's and women's sports - a historical distinction intended to recognise differences in physical strength and capabilities between the sexes. So far so good, but what happens when these differences are not so clear cut?
The sports world is a microcosm of the world at large - the confusion and fiery passions surrounding gender ambiguity touch a raw nerve that reverberates within each of our psyches and throughout our society.
When the distinction is clear between who is a man and who is a woman, we know how to relate to each other. When this distinction is blurred or eroded, we become anxious and disorientated.
A 'true' hermaphrodite, ie an organism born with a complete set of male and female sexual organs, only exists among other species such as the earthworm. The gender of humans is determined by the development of the gonads within the embryo. Because we are born with one set of gonads, this means that despite abnormalities in development, our sexual characteristics are either male or female. In normal female development, the gonads will become ovaries, the female genitalia will enlarge and the male genitalia will recede.
When gender is ambiguous in another, it challenges conceptions of who we are
The opposite occurs in the case of male development. To describe a person as a 'true' hermaphrodite is therefore a misnomer. The correct term is either a pseudo-hermaphrodite or, in its politicised form, an intersex.
In instances of sexual ambiguity, gender is ultimately determined by the internal characteristics of the gonads. A male hermaphrodite is identified by the presence of internal testis and a female hermaphrodite has internal ovaries, regardless of external genitalia. Every so-called hermaphrodite has a gender, although someone’s appearance may belie it. What is intolerable in our minds is sexual ambiguity.
Despite the reality that there is no such thing as a 'hermaphrodite' among humans, the possibility of embodying both sexes is a powerful fantasy. The image of the hermaphrodite that is prevalent in so many religions symbolises spiritual unity between opposites and completeness or inner harmony.
On a more primitive level, the hermaphrodite fascinates us because it transcends sexual difference and holds out the illusion of being able to experience what it is like to be the opposite sex - one of the greatest mysteries of our lives.
While the symbol of the hermaphrodite is fascinating because it breaks the boundaries of nature, its reality is horrifying for the same reasons. Gender identity provides us with the most basic guide as to how we relate to others while it also affects the way in which we experience ourselves and our own gender identity.
When gender identity is ambiguous in someone else, it challenges our conceptions of who we are. It can also trigger anxieties about our own unconscious homosexual fantasies. The hermaphrodite exists outside our gender assumptions and expectations and this is what is so very disturbing.
Our core identity is based on gender. The first question asked about a newborn baby is its sex. When this is in doubt or equivocal it is like losing one's internal compass or seeing an indeterminate being in the mirror.
Our core identity is gender-based. We always ask what sex a baby is first
The hermaphrodite confronts us with the fact that our gender is inextricably tied up with our feelings of potency - whether we call ourselves men or women. It makes us fearful of losing our potency and sense of self and of being taken over by what may feel like an alien other within us. Being without gender has the makings of madness.
This is very different from the homosexual, transvestite or transsexual who normally has a clear sense of his gender identity even when it may not correspond to what he looks like.
According to the leaked reports, Semenya’s test results indicate that she has internal testes and this means, strictly speaking, 'she' qualifies as a 'he'. Not only is she being hounded off the running track by her opponents, but she is being told that she is not the young woman she thought she was.
It is hardly surprising that she has gone into hiding and is being given counselling for trauma. The discovery that her gender is by no means clear places Semenya in a transitional role, no longer able to claim she is a woman and yet unable to be a man. She has to make sense of the incongruity that she is now faced with between her body, now classified as male, and her mental experience of being a woman.
While her supporters, including the American gold medalist Carl Lewis, are decrying how unprotected Semenya has been, her strength will undoubtedly lie in her experience of how she was loved as an infant and in how secure her mother felt as a woman.
If she is in fact able to accept herself as she says, she will be able to weather this ordeal and be a champion in a larger arena. She has certainly made us all aware that the assignment of gender
identity is something that is conferred and constructed - it is not simply a biological given.
Filed under: Caster Semenya, Coline Covington, psychoanalysis
- Most Read
- Most Emailed
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10


Comments
Hide comments
I don't know what to say. From an athletics point of view, most women would not want to compete against Caster. And Caster probably would not win competing against males. I feel sorry for Caster. I wish him/her the best.
Posted by C Nappier at 12:06pm on September 17, 2009
I don't know about being "scared of hermaphrodytes". What we need to get clear is which gender classificatio he/she should compete in. Perhaps we should have a third classification for athletics (?and all sports) - that would add 50% to the gold medals etc and how the advertisers would love it.
Posted by alan scott at 12:15pm on September 17, 2009
Firstly, there have been cases of babies born with both male and female genitals, so there are hermaphrodites although they are very rare. 'Whether we call ourselves men or women' it is stated. Unless you are one of the extremely rare cases mentioned above, you are either male or female. To see yourself as psychologically the opposite of your physical gender is recognised as a psychiatric or psychological problem. Due to a recent TV programme, I was looking up this scientific based information just a couple of days ago. Why the sudden apparent obsession with transexuals and transvestites then? Have the feminist controllers who create little franchises out of such issues got fed up with patronising their other designated minority groupings? Unless I misinterpreted the article, it appeared to suggest that transvestites are more sure of their identity than normal people. Not only could nothing be further from the truth, but it seems that as usual, when feminists bleat about minority 'victims', they are invariably portrayed as in some way being superior to the rest of the populace. Just last night I was watching an old episode of 'Sex and the City'. To fans of the programme, it was the episode when Charlotte dates a pastry chef, and she and the girls can't make their minds up as to whether he is a 'straight gay man', or a 'gay straight man'. When confronted with his sexual ambiguity, he simply says, 'If I were gay, then I would be gay'. The character is heterosexual, so am I, but if I was gay I would be gay and if hermaphrodites are so sure of what it is they are, then why is this even being discussed? Gays who don't like having their marches challenged use reverse psychology on their victims and say 'You wouldn't object so much unless you were gay yourself'. Maybe the best way of psychologically stopping the exploitation of this 'issue' as the latest feminist 'cause', is to point out that it is they who have turned this whole charade into a modern day 'freak show' and an excercise in self-righteousness, with themselves claiming a moral high ground that simply doesn't exist.
Posted by Jerome Peter at 1:07pm on September 17, 2009
If she's Androgen insensitive - as she appears to be - then she can't actually benefit from that excess testosterone. That's what androgen insensitivity means, that she's partly immune to the stuff. // Three times the normal female average might actually be *less* effective for her than a normal amount would be to another woman. // The International Athletics bodies recognise this - in 1996, 8 athletes with androgen insensitivity "failed the sex test" but were allowed to compete anyway. Because severe androgen insensitivity - severe enough to result in female external genitalia - means they get no advantage. // Apart from that - spot on. I'm Intersexed myself, technically a "protandrous dichogamous pseudohermaphrodite". I prefer "woman with an interesting medical history". Or just plain "woman" for short.
Posted by Zoe Brain at 6:04pm on September 17, 2009
In a world that accepts homosexuals, bisexuals, trans genders, and who knows what else, it is disgusting how this young lady is being hounded and abased, and made to feel less than human. What has happened to all the proponents of human rights?
Posted by myrna smith at 12:42am on September 18, 2009
'She has certainly made us all aware that the assignment of gender identity is something that is conferred and constructed - it is not simply a biological given' I do not see how it has done this, after all the controversy about whether she is a man or woman is based SOLEY on biological, anatomical and chemical factors, not at all on how she sees herself. It is being said that how she and her family see her is factually wrong or at least problematic. This seems to show that we do consider it a biological given. As Jerome Peter says 'Unless you are one of the extremely rare cases mentioned above, you are either male or female. To see yourself as psychologically the opposite of your physical gender is recognised as a psychiatric or psychological problem.' However, is it really true in these enlightened times that we are still afraid of gender ambiguity? surely this is just a case of fair competition in athletics, the rest is just the usual media prurience. By the way Jerome Peter, thanks for the statutory anti-feminist rant - no batch of comments is complete without it!!
Posted by Hilary Easton at 11:40am on September 19, 2009
She/he is just one of those phenomena we see around us every day.That this person excites homosexual fears in us is absolute hogwash.What kind of fears gays experience confronted with this person?Any guess?
Posted by mukeshnana at 4:19pm on September 21, 2009
Who's frightened? No one I know. Fair competition seems a real concern though.
Posted by Far Quah at 5:22am on October 7, 2009
Fears? Frightened? Rubbish!! The subject is only cropping up due to having to be a specific gender for a fair competition for all the athletes.
Posted by polly at 11:32am on November 9, 2009
Add comment
You must be signed into your user account to add a comment.