skip to nav

The naked truth about American sexual prudery

SWAT team

Alexander Cockburn: A man walks naked into his kitchen, and all hell breaks loose

LAST UPDATED 8:56 AM, OCTOBER 29, 2009

Just how funny was that story of the man in Fairfax County, Virginia, who got up early on Monday morning, October 19, and walked naked into his own kitchen to make himself a cup of coffee? The next significant thing that happened to 29-year-old Eric Williamson was the local cops arriving to charge him with indecent exposure.

It turns out that while he was brewing the coffee, a mother who was taking her seven-year-old son along a path beside Williamson's house espied the naked householder and called the local precinct, or more likely her husband, who turns out to be a cop.

"Yes, I wasn't wearing any clothes," Williamson said later, "but I was alone, in my own home and I just got out of bed. It was dark and I had no idea anyone was outside looking in at me."

The story ended up on TV, and in the opening rounds the newscasters and network blogs had merciless sport with the Fairfax police for their absurd behaviour. Hasn’t a man the right to walk around his own home (or in this case rented accommodation) dressed according to his fancy? Answer, obvious to anyone familiar with relevant case law: absolutely not.

Williamson will be lucky if they don’t throw a cobbled-up indictment at him

Peeved by public ridicule, the Fairfax cops turned up the heat. The cop's wife started to maintain that first she saw Williamson by a glass kitchen door, then through the kitchen window. Mary Ann Jennings, a Fairfax County Police spokesperson, stirred the pot of innuendo: "We've heard there may have been other people who had a similar incident."

The cops are asking anyone who may have seen an unclothed Williamson through his windows to come forward, even if it was at a different time. They've also been papering the neighbourhood with fliers, asking for reports on any other questionable activities by anyone resembling Williamson - a white guy who's a commercial diver, and who has a five-year-old daughter, not living with him.

I'd say that if the cops keep it up, and some prosecutor scents opportunity, Williamson will be pretty lucky if they don't throw some cobbled-up indictment at him. Toss in a jailhouse snitch keen to make his own plea deal, a faked police line-up, maybe an artist's impression of the Fairfax Flasher, and Eric could end up losing his visitation rights and, if worst comes to worst, getting ten years in jail and being posted for life on some sex offender site.

You think we're living in the 21st century, in the clinical fantasy world of CSI? Wrong. So far as forensic evidence is concerned, we remain planted in the 17th century with trial by ordeal, such as when they killed women for being witches if they floated when thrown into a pond.

Now let’s head north from Fairfax county to Massachusetts, home of the witch trials.

How about if you're white in Boston (wise decision), weigh yourself in your own bedroom with no clothes on and... But let my Boston friend pick up the story, because it happened to him.

"It was the early 90s. Early on Xmas eve two burly cops pushed into our house and invaded our bedroom - no warrant. They only backed off after they realised that the scale in our bedroom where I weighed myself was in front of a window. To see me there, the born-again Christians who moved in next door (actually on the far side of a vacant lot separating us) had to keep a tight watch since it does not take long to weigh oneself.

"My girlfriend was dressing in the bedrooom and my mom and stepdaughter were visiting. By the time the cops understood that I had been weighing myself every morning, the paddy wagon was there ready to take me away.

"I would have sued them but I was running for Congress at the time. The cops liked my opponent, a right-wing pro-lifer, and I have always thought that had something to do with their moral diligence that day. One of the cops, the chief, later resigned in a corruption scandal."

Year after year in America, this prudery exacts a terrible toll

This was in the early 1990s, please note. This was when the wave of hysteria over satanic abuse of children was in full spate, with people being imprisoned for life on just the sort of "evidence" the cops are now trying to marshal against Williamson. Massachusetts actually saw the first trial of a daycare teacher charged with satanic abuse. Bernard Baran was released after nearly 22 years and exonerated three years after that, on June 9 this year.

As the attorney Mike Snedeker, who co-authored with Debbie Nathan the 1995 book Satan's Silence: Ritual Abuse and the Making of a Modern American Witch Hunt, recently reminded us on the CounterPunch website, there are victims of that hysteria, almost certainly innocent, still rotting in prison almost a generation later: for example, Fran and Danny Keller in Texas, and James Toward and Francisco Fuster in Florida.

The 'satanic abuse' hysteria was particularly appalling, but year after year in America prudery exacts a terrible toll – as witness the unfortunate female schoolteachers packed often to prison with hefty sentences for having affairs with boys in their mid to late teens.

Is America permanently lodged in the 17th century so far as moral policing is concerned? The answer is Not exactly, since gay marriage wasn’t a big item on the legislative agenda of the colonies at that time. But regulation of sexual behaviour is the preferred route to wider social control.

The control of sex and pornography is a major part of promulgating a puritanical political culture without ever imposing overt political censorship. Sexual repression, often through the allegation of 'deviant' fantasy crimes, is the designated stand-in for violations of the social order that are hard to crush in a courtroom. As Williamson is now ruefully aware, the state not only has a long arm, it has a long gaze.

Moral: the eyes of the law are on you at all times, even at 8.30 am in the supposed privacy of your own kitchen. 

LAST UPDATED 8:56 AM, OCTOBER 29, 2009

Filed under: Alexander Cockburn, United States, Module

Add to:

Comments

Hide comments

Amazing when you consider the US is the largest purveyor of pornography.

Posted by Peter at 10:25am on October 29, 2009

We can blame this on the christians; sex-hating, death-fearing fascistic wierdos. They were also the witch hunters, it's just what they've turned into in the modern world. And we in the UK get the fallout from their fantasies, witness the satanic abuse excitement which had social workers and police removing Scottish children from their parents some years back. America, land of the free? What a joke, it's the most repressive country in the world after Saudi Arabia.

Posted by Peter Simmons at 10:48am on October 29, 2009

I don't think it's particularly amazing that the US is the largest purveyor of pornography. I think the two are inextricably linked. Hypocrisy and extremism are two sides of the same coin, and the currency is Guilt. :-)

Posted by Jess D at 11:30am on October 29, 2009

Just get curtains or a dressing gown. Please don't stand naked in front of any windows facing the public.

Posted by cliffxdavis at 12:24pm on October 29, 2009

ERIC-CHARGE THE POLICEMANS WIFE FOR BEING A PEEPING TOM YOU HAVE BEEN VIOLATED. BRAM

Posted by bram davies at 12:55pm on October 29, 2009

Stories about the misapplication of old laws or dim witted law enforcement agents do not merit serous attention. Very few people in the US are talking about this story or even really care about it. Mr Cockburn is clearly the exception.

Posted by Alex Harris at 1:45pm on October 29, 2009

America is an extremely repressing country with fanatical cops that fly off the handle easily. The reason why the world doesn't know it is that unlike Tajikstan America has an excellent P.R. machine. So peeping Tom (Tomasina) is okay... Hmm...y'know if you stand on stool in the bathtub and lean out of the bathroom window you can see into the other apartment, and the way the mirror is placed, you can see into the bathroom of 4B....

Posted by suzann Dodd at 2:39pm on October 29, 2009

On the odd chance that someone happens by this site, unfamiliar with Cockburn's shtick, and thinks anything written here bears a relationship to the truth, here is an actual news report of the incident, which shows that reality is usually a little more complex (if not more amusing) and harder to use for polemical purposes. http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/local/crime/Was-he-making-coffee-naked-or-exposing-himself_-8418601.html As far the atrocities committed by your ancestors when they first came to this country go, we've forgiven and forgotten them long ago.

Posted by Ed Fisher at 3:01pm on October 29, 2009

Seriously. Can we not even be naked in our own bedroom anymore? This story is total bs and due to the insecurity of the police an innocent man can face jail time over a rediculous witch hunts. I mean think people, what would that woman think if i walked by her house while she was changing her clothes. She needs to get over herself and get a brain.

Posted by paige weirich at 5:58pm on October 29, 2009

It's good to have a bit of lighthearted nonsense to read now and again. If true it doesn't surprise me one bit. That is a country where, if you pull out a gun nobody takes any notice, but if you pull out a packet of cigarettes you'll likely cause a riot!

Posted by Keith Gowthorpe at 5:28pm on October 30, 2009

The Peeping Tom comment is right on--and beyond the private homes of ordinary Americans there's probably not a place on this globe that American surveillance doesn't reach, folks. Perhaps your only safe response is to keep your blinds drawn day and night. That'll really get them worried. Who knows what's going on inside those walls?

Posted by lollylu at 8:12pm on October 30, 2009

OK, I'm American and Christian and I happen to hang out at home butt-naked all the time, so I don't think it's fair to blame it on Christians. It is true, however, that Americans are rather more prudish than many other people--a lot of Europeans, for example. I just think voyeuristic people should not condemn the people whose lives they nose into--after all, they're the ones so eager to look. Obviously this is a case of small-town people with small-town cops and a small-town mentality.

Posted by eleanorigby at 5:29pm on October 31, 2009

Well you can't stand in front of your living room window naked in Canada either. But then theres the question of intent. Do it day after day when the same gal ( or guy) walks by , and its a Criminal Code offence. Stumble out of your bedroom once and you might be OK. You are certainly inside your own house, but in full view of the public. Most people would cover up, or close the curtains.

Posted by MichaelG at 7:32am on November 1, 2009

This surreal article brings to mind the joke of the old lady who accused her next door neighbor of indecent exposure. In summary, upon cross examination it was disclosed that the Old lady had to stand tip toe on a crate to peer in the neighbor's window. It would be funny but for the abuse of government power. "There is no crueler tyranny than that which is exercised under cover of law, and with the colors of justice - U.S. vs. Jannottie, 673 F.2d 578, 614 (3d Cir. 1982).

Posted by IsidoroRDL at 5:53pm on November 2, 2009

Add comment

You must be signed into your user account to add a comment.

  Forgotten password?
 
  or create an account

sign up for the daily email

News & Comment: News & Politics