Secret letter shows Blair ‘knew Iraq war was illegal’

But Blair denies he bullied Attorney-General Goldsmith to keep letter secret
The pressure on Tony Blair is mounting. After only four days of the Chilcot inquiry, the former prime minister is reported to be furious that a succession of senior diplomats and civil servants have torn into his reputation by questioning his judgment and honesty over the decision to go to war with Iraq.
On Sunday, it got considerably worse. The Mail on Sunday reported that Blair's senior legal advisor at the time, Attorney-General Lord Goldsmith, wrote his boss a letter in July 2002, eight months before the invasion, making it clear that a declaration of war on Iraq, with a view to deposing Saddam Hussein, would be illegal.
Not only did Blair ignore the advice, he issued instructions that Goldsmith should be gagged and barred from Cabinet, and then ordered a cover-up to ensure the public never found out about Goldsmith's advice, said the Mail.
Today, Blair denied that he had gagged Goldsmith and, when asked by CNN whether it was true that the Attorney-General had been bullied into keeping quiet, replied: "No it's not".
Goldsmith wrote the letter on July 29, 2002, on a single side of A4 headed notepaper, after attending a Cabinet meeting six days earlier at which he was apparently horrified to hear that Britain and America were set on 'regime change' in Iraq.
The Attorney General was unequivocal in his argument that the war would be illegal. He pointed out that:
♦ Although UN rules permitted military intervention on the basis of self-defence, they did not apply in this case because Britain was not under threat from Iraq;
♦ While the UN allowed "humanitarian intervention" in certain cases, this did not apply here;
♦ It would be hard to rely on earlier UN resolutions dating back to the 1990s approving the use of force against Saddam Hussein.
The Mail claimed Blair was infuriated by the letter - not just its contents but the fact that Goldsmith had committed this thoughts to paper. As well barring Goldsmith from Cabinet, Blair chose not to inform other Cabinet members of the Attorney-General's advice.
Eight months later, after being virtually ostracised by Downing Street and losing three stone in weight because of his anxiety, Goldsmith finally gave Blair what he wanted, according to the Mail. After being "more or less pinned against the wall" by two of Blair's loyal aides, Lord (Charles) Falconer and Baroness (Sally) Morgan, Goldsmith issued a brief statement saying the war was legal on the basis of previous UN resolutions - despite having said the opposite in his July 2002 letter.
Without Goldsmith's say-so, British military leaders were not prepared to send troops into action. With it, the invasion could begin.
The letter from Goldsmith, which is now likely to be central to any move to charge Blair as a war criminal, is understood to be in a bundle of documents supplied to Chilcot by the
Attorney-General's department. Both Blair and Goldsmith are due to go before the inquiry in the new year. Blair said today he would respond in full to the Mail on Sunday allegation when
that time comes.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
- Most Read
- Most Emailed
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10


Comments
Hide comments
Some of us were awake at the time and could see Blair was lying repeatedly and wanted war above all else. Pity so many in government and the media allowed themselves to be persuaded it was necessary. Anyone who was persaded by this lying heap of puss is as culpable as he. Deranged ego-driven psychos only need willing accomplices to kill hundreds of thousands. There were plenty of people saw through Blairs lies at the time, funny how some are now complaining they were duped. They're either too stupid and gullible to be anything but a cleaner, or they are guilty of willingly being persuaded. Can't have it both ways.
Posted by foolonthehill at 11:12am on November 30, 2009
With the best will in the world, these are no revelations at all. I can remember the sequence of events clearly, as should everyone who was following the news at that time. This was indeed the key issue, but the Attorney-General DID give his OK in the end. Like most other people, I assumed this meant the war was legal - just.
Posted by Anthony McCall-Judson at 11:19am on November 30, 2009
Blair is being left increasingly isolated as his former co-conspirat....er colleagues distance themselves from him. I have little doubt that if this horrible man is brought to book for crimes against humanity, which depending on your politics could be even wider ranging than wars abroad, he will demand centre stage and hog the media limelight, yet attempt to incriminate and bring down as many others with him, partly to protect himself. I always despised him because I could see right through his smarm and so could many others. Let justice prevail.
Posted by Jerome Peter at 2:35pm on November 30, 2009
At the time I thought Blair was being put under great pressure by Bush to commit Britain to the future war against Iraq. I felt sorry for him and although I'm a nobody I felt I could help him out. So I faxed Bush, the White House fax number is in the public domain, and I emphasised how unpopular such a war would be by the British people and at the bottom of the letter I wrote copy sent to Prime Minister Blair. Blair could have said no to Bush citing the British Public Opposition that existed saying he had no mandate for the war. I wonder if these two jobs he has got at a half a million each is pay off? I admire former Prime Minister Heath, he was a house of Commons Man and not a man for himself. Blair has cut and run. The safest thing for him to do is to become an American Citizen so that he wont be sent to the Hague.
Posted by PHILIP LEAMAN at 6:09pm on November 30, 2009
For eight years we've been campaigning to have Blair tried for war-crimes. But the chances that the Chilcot Inquiry will be anything other than a whitewash are zero.
Posted by Neil McGowan at 9:50pm on November 30, 2009
The Attorney-General and Solicitor-General have responsibilities toward European and International Law with respect to the Government. Harriot Harman was I believe the Solicitor-General at the time, would she have any knowlege of Lord Goldsmith's concernes?
Posted by Steve W. at 12:29pm on December 1, 2009
Add comment
You must be signed into your user account to add a comment.