If we want to make flying pleasant again, we must renationalise BAA, says neil clark |
|
Across the political spectrum there is widespread agreement that Britain's
airports, with their long queues, lack of seats and tacky, shopping mall
atmosphere, are a national disgrace. But the solution is not to break up
BAA's monopoly and introduce 'more competition' as some have suggested. The
answer is to simply take BAA back into public ownership.
Sir Terence Conran, who designed Terminal One at Heathrow and the North
Terminal in the 1960s, has contrasted the brief he received from the owners of the
airports back then - the British state - with the instructions Lord (Richard) Rogers,
the architect of Terminal 5, got from BAA.
Conran was told to put in as many
seats as possible, with the priority being to make passengers 'relax and
feel at ease'. At Terminal One there were only three shops.
The privatised BAA
told Rogers to put in as |
|
 |
 |
 |
| BAA wants people to pay to sit down at Terminal 5’s expensive restaurants – not sit down for free |
|
 |
few seats as possible: there will be only 700
seats for a terminal handling an average of 80,000 passengers a day when it opens in March 2008. BAA wants
people to pay to sit down at the terminal's expensive cafes and restaurants -
not sit down for free, eating their own sandwiches.
The approach perfectly illustrates the difference in ethos between a
publicly-owned company, for whom profit is not the be all and end all, and a
privatised one.
We can't blame BAA for treating every square foot at
Heathrow as a profit centre: it's a private company which wants to maximise
returns for its shareholders. But we can blame the politicians foolish
enough to sell off BAA in the first place. Allowing other profit-hungry plcs
to compete to run our airports would only mean more of the same.
If we really want Heathrow and our other airports to be comfortable and reasonably easy to negotiate, we need to change the whole philosophy under which they operate. And that means returning them to their most appropriate owners: the British public. 
FIRST POSTED AUGUST 8, 2007
|