skip to nav

code-breakers at Bletchley Park by writing to his gofers on paper headed "ACTION THIS DAY" to demand: "Make sure they have all they want on extreme priority and report to me that this had been done."

It is most assuredly not the mindset that demands countless public consultations, planning meetings and health and safety studies before anything gets done. In war there simply isn't time: decisions have to be taken in the face of uncertainty. Sometimes they turn out to be wrong; taking no decision, on the other hand, leads to the certainty of annihilation.

All very apocalyptic, but that is precisely the view we have been told to adopt about the consequences of global warming by environmentalists. Time is running out, and action is needed – perhaps not this day, but very soon by the timescales of global politics.

But do environmentalists really have the mettle for a War on Climate Change? With their relentlessly gloomy vision of the future, they seem more like Private 'We're all doomed' Frazer than steely-eyed strategists.

Churchill did not demand countless public consultations and health and safety studies before making decisions

Even so, if they really are sincere about acting on global warming, they must follow the example of wartime scientists, and give politicians solutions, not problems.

They must drop the notion that a perfect answer exists out there somewhere - if only enough time was spent dreaming it up. For example, no-one thinks nuclear power is the perfect solution to energy generation – but it beats the hell out of letting the lights go out.

There must also be an acceptance that there's neither the time nor resources to tackle every aspect of climate change. And that means drawing up invidious priority lists and building coalitions of the willing to tackle them. Self-indulgent campaigns aimed at making us all feel guilty – about, say, using cheap air travel, which is of trivial importance for climate change – are no way to do either.

If environmentalists start acting as if there's a war on, they might actually succeed in their self-appointed aim of saving the planet. But they haven't a hope as long as they keep treating the rest of us as the enemy.

FIRST POSTED AUGUST 20, 2007

News & Comment: News & Politics