skip to nav
Wednesday July 2, 2008

Zimbabwe is inconsequential

Seldom has so much time, space and hot air been devoted to a country that is so inconsequential to British interests, says Michael Holman. Unlike Iraq or Afghanistan, where oil, narcotics or terrorism are deemed grounds enough to warrant British troops, no soldier will die on African soil. No British jobs are at stake, no significant investment in jeopardy, no pension fund risks taking a knock. Tourism has been reduced to a trickle, trade is negligible. Tibet and Burma surge briefly and fall away, leaving few if any marks on the national psyche. But Zimbabwe endures, as emotive as Suez but without the import. Michael Holman The Times
Zimbabwe Today: More African states protest against Mugabe More

Filed under: Michael Holman, Zimbabwe

Sanctions are counterproductive

Subjecting a political economy to siege leads to consequences, says Simon Jenkins. It enforces a command economy, in which the rulers keep what they want for themselves, skimming every deal and corrupting every transaction. It made Saddam Hussein the sixth richest man in the world, as it enriched the Taliban warlords, the Burmese generals and Robert Mugabe. Sanctions over time destroy the mercantile, managerial and professional classes, the rootstock of opposition to totalitarian government. They push power into the hands of brute force. The withdrawal of trade closes factories, farms and mines, and debilitates the political effectiveness of those dependent on them. More people must rely on state handouts - that is, on the regime. Disinvestment transfers local assets to the ruler's cronies and prevents foreign traders ameliorating the condition of the people. Simon Jenkins The Guardian
The latest from Zimbabwe More

Simon Jenkins

What the NHS constitution forgot

We all, deep down, know the score, don't we? A technological revolution in medical services is under way, says Daniel Finkelstein. It means that we are going to reach the point, are already reaching the point, when the range of services we could, in theory, obtain is so great that it tests our willingness to pay for it all for everyone. There are more than 40 new cancer drugs in the final stages of development - the products of the molecular revolution triggered by the discovery of the structure of DNA. These work. They extend lives. But they are expensive - the cost of getting a single drug to market now exceeds $1 billion. So, many of them will not be available on the NHS. How could the NHS constitution pass over this in silence?

Daniel Finkelstein The Times

Obama's shift to the centre

Presidential candidates always have to shift towards the centre after a primary campaign, writes Jonathan Freedland. But Obama is not just any candidate. "You can't do it if you've run as Gandhi," says Leon Wieseltier. He contrasts Obama with the Bill Clinton of 1992. Both men offered to transcend the old categories of left and right, but Clinton did so by promising to be ideologically flexible. Obama's implicit promise is that he is above left and right, not because he is pragmatic so much as because he is morally good. In this context, says Wieseltier, U-turns are much less tolerable: "They compromise his radiance." There are other contrasts. Bill Clinton could finesse shifts by wrapping them in the language of policy detail; Obama is the very opposite of a policy wonk. He operates at 30,000 feet, somewhere in the rhetorical stratosphere.   Jonathan Freedland The Guardian
A Reagan of the Left? Not much chance More

Jonathan Freedland

 

Education - an obscene joke

A candidate was awarded marks in his GCSE English exam for writing 'F*** off' on his paper as a gratuitous profanity, writes Melanie Phillips. So this is what our once glorious education system has come to  -  that if a child writes anything at all on a sheet of paper, examiners are so pathetically grateful, they will award him marks.  So much of what schoolchildren are now expected to do is a joke. Too many pass exams by ticking boxes with pictures in them. Too many are told they can read when all they are actually doing is memorising or guessing the words on the page. Too many have never been taught the rules of formal grammar which actually enable them to decode foreign languages.

Melanie Phillips Daily Mail

sign up for our daily email

Enter your email address to receive our Daily Email in your inbox every weekday


You may have to register on the next screen if you haven’t signed up before.

ADVERTISEMENT

In Brief

Home counties hero

The tennis establishment and much of the Wimbledon crowd loved Tim Henman because to them he represented their Britain, a Britain of Harvest Festivals, home-made damson jam, and Cliff Richard; of "Don't go near the housing estate darling, you'll come back smelling of overalls and milk tokens and ITV". Mark Steel The Independent
Sports Page: how Murray can beat Nadal More

 

Genetic differences

There are certainly real genetic differences between human populations. North Europeans, for instance, are more likely to suffer from cystic fibrosis than other groups. Tay-Sachs, a fatal disease of the central nervous system, particularly affects Ashkenazi Jews. There are more subtle differences, too. Africans are twice as likely to have a twin as Europeans, who are in turn twice as likely to do so as East Asians.
Kenan Malik The Times
Inject some intelligence into the race debate More

Filed under: Kenan Malik, Genetics

Support for the bigots

Religion does not have to be the enemy of social progress. On the contrary, Anglicans have a strong progressive tradition. Secularists, in refusing to take an intelligent interest in the debates and the challenges of those who resist such unsettling tendencies within religious groups, run the risk of offering tacit support to the bigots and the fundamentalists.

Deborah Orr The Independent

Filed under: Deborah Orr, Religion

Obama is Spartacus

This weekend word emerged of a new fad on college campuses, as students, both male and female, adopt Obama's middle name of Hussein - the target for much xenophobic whispering - as their own. Think "I am Spartacus".

Jonathan Freedland The Guardian

One hit wonders

The greatest leaders usually have one big thing they want to accomplish. Churchill wanted to defeat fascism; Truman wanted to contain communism; Margaret Thatcher aimed to end fashionable declinism; Ronald Reagan brought down the "evil empire". Other issues were treated by these leaders as subsidiary to their main goal. None would have ordered a special commission to investigate the safety of sunbeds. Irwin Stelzer Daily Telegraph

Filed under: Irwin Stelzer, History
Our news digests
  • Newsdesk
  • People
  • Business Pages
  • Opinion
  • Sports Page
  • Sunday Papers

ADVERTISEMENT